<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Education Solidarity Network</title>
	<atom:link href="http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org</link>
	<description>Global Solidarity to Defend Education</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 09:25:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Italian education system under attack from cuts and privatisation</title>
		<link>http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/2010/09/italian-education-system-under-attack-from-cuts-and-privatisation/</link>
		<comments>http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/2010/09/italian-education-system-under-attack-from-cuts-and-privatisation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 09:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ucu campaigns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[higher education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privatisation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/?p=310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A report from Marco Broccati, FLC CGIL (Italy)</p>
<p>In Italy, things are going from bad to worse. This Government has cut funding in every public branch. Schools, Universities and public institutions of research have been the first victims. We had, all in all, a cut of about 10 billions euros in 3 years, which means a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A report from Marco Broccati, FLC CGIL (Italy)</p>
<p>In Italy, things are going from bad to worse. This Government has cut funding in every public branch. Schools, Universities and public institutions of research have been the first victims. We had, all in all, a cut of about 10 billions euros in 3 years, which means a cut of 150,000 teachers and researchers in the same period. At this time, school teachers are striking in front of the Parliament without eating and drinking. But the Minister of Education Gelmini refuses to meet them, pretending that this is a &#8220;political protest&#8221; set up by the opposition Parties. Our public school system is disrupted: we cannot guarantee services to families. So is the University system: by the end of the year, most Universities will not be able to pay the wages of teachers and technical-administrative staff. As for research institutions, all funding for research projects has been cut. The so-called &#8220;reforms&#8221; of school and university have only the aim to cut and reduce the role and presence of the public sector, giving way to private schools and universities. It should be remarked that while the funding of public institutions has been reduced, private institutions have grown their funding. This year we&#8217;ll have to deal with about 40,000 school teachers losing their job. Can you call this the &#8220;knowledge society&#8221;? It really looks like a project to create an &#8220;ignorant society&#8221; This is what our Government is planning for our future. But they won&#8217;t succeed. Knowledge workers and FLC will make a stand.</p>
<p>Marco Broccati. FLC CGIL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/2010/09/italian-education-system-under-attack-from-cuts-and-privatisation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Washington Post share price falling as Kaplan students default on loans</title>
		<link>http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/2010/09/washington-post-share-price-falling-as-kaplan-students-default-on-loans/</link>
		<comments>http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/2010/09/washington-post-share-price-falling-as-kaplan-students-default-on-loans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 15:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ucu campaigns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Providers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kaplan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privatisation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/?p=303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>An interesting report in the Observer newspaper on 22 August picked up that Kaplan&#8217;s parent company, the Washington Post, saw its share price fall to the lowest point this year as the row about defaults on student loans among private sector students in the USA continues. Peter Preston&#8217;s report noted:</p>
<p>&#8220;Some 62% of Post revenues last year [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting report in the Observer newspaper on 22 August picked up that Kaplan&#8217;s parent company, the Washington Post, saw its share price fall to the lowest point this year as the row about defaults on student loans among private sector students in the USA continues. Peter Preston&#8217;s report noted:</p>
<p>&#8220;Some 62% of <em>Post </em>revenues last year come from the Kaplan private education empire it owns: 600 institutions in 30 countries, 1 million <a title="More from guardian.co.uk on Students" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/students">students</a>, 31,000 staff. It&#8217;s a profitable empire over two dozen major sites in the UK alone. Think Liverpool, Leicester and Bradford, as well as Holborn College.</p>
<p>But in the US, its former students seem a bit slow at repaying their loans – repayment rates are 28% as opposed to 54% of alumni at public colleges – and federal financial aid is in jeopardy. So the share price plummets.&#8221;</p>
<p>Read the full story here: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/aug/22/washington-post-studen-loan-trouble">http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/aug/22/washington-post-studen-loan-trouble</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/2010/09/washington-post-share-price-falling-as-kaplan-students-default-on-loans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fighting the commercialisation of research in the UK</title>
		<link>http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/2010/09/294/</link>
		<comments>http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/2010/09/294/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 15:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ucu campaigns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/?p=294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Victory for research &#8211; plans to make funding dependent on ‘economic impact’ postponed
<p style="text-align: left;">On 9 July 2010 UCU welcomed the announcement from the minister for universities and science, David Willetts, that there would be a one-year delay in order to review proposed changes to the Research Excellence Framework (REF): UCU welcomes decision to postpone [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3 style="text-align: left;">Victory for research &#8211; plans to make funding dependent on ‘economic impact’ postponed</h3>
<p style="text-align: left;">On 9 July 2010 UCU welcomed the announcement from the minister for universities and science, David Willetts, that there would be a one-year delay in order to review proposed changes to the Research Excellence Framework (REF): <a title="Link to UCU welcomes decision to postpone plans to force economic impact into research" href="http://www.ucu.org.uk/index.cfm?articleid=4740">UCU welcomes decision to postpone plans to force economic impact into research</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">The proposed changes would have placed a judgement about the ‘economic impact’ of research activity at the heart of decisions about future funding.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">However, the proposals, developed under the previous New Labour administration, came under sustained attack from the academic community in a campaign led by the University and College Union and in April this year, it was announced that government body that funds much research in UK universities was bowing to the ‘unexpected’ pressure and delaying implementation of the proposals until after the May general election.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">UCU argued that the proposals which would have meant that 25% of any funding decision would be based on an assessment of the ‘economic impact’ of research activity, would erode the basis of genuine innovation by stifling long-term, curiosity-based or Blue-Skies research, as well as threatening to wipe out entire disciplines in the humanities.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">UCU submitted a petition to withdraw the impact proposals, signed by almost 18,000 academics, including six Nobel prize winners and leading academics from every field. The union also ran a poll of senior academics that showed that one third would consider pursuing their careers abroad if the impact proposals were enacted.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Following intensive lobbying, the influential Science and Technology committee of MPs in Parliament announced that it would make ‘impact’ part of its enquiry and called UCU to give evidence. The Committee’s report, published in March 2010, warned that finding a fair and effective way of measuring impact represented an &#8220;insurmountable&#8221; problem.</p>
<h4 style="text-align: left;">The news that these proposals will indeed be mothballed for the time being represents a much-needed victory for the academic community against the commercialisation of research and the subjection of research activity to the demands of business.</h4>
<h4 style="text-align: left;">Winning the argument against the savage cuts in UK higher education funding will be a bigger and harder fight.</h4>
<h4 style="text-align: left;">Read more here: <a href="http://www.ucu.org.uk/standupforresearch">http://www.ucu.org.uk/standupforresearch</a></h4>
<h4 style="text-align: left;"> </h4>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/2010/09/294/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UK academics slam privatisation of universities as BPP becomes &#8216;university college&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/2010/08/uk-academics-slam-privatisation-of-universities-as-bpp-becomes-university-college/</link>
		<comments>http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/2010/08/uk-academics-slam-privatisation-of-universities-as-bpp-becomes-university-college/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 16:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ucu campaigns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Providers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apollo Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privatisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Phoenix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/?p=276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>UCU warned the Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition government that encouraging the growth of private universities would damage the UK’s international reputation and invite serious questions about standards. BPP, the subsidiary of Apollo which has degree awarding powers, has been lobbying the government heavily to relax the regulations on who can call themselves a university.</p>
<p>As the Times Higher reported [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UCU warned the Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition government that encouraging the growth of private universities would damage the UK’s international reputation and invite serious questions about standards. BPP, the subsidiary of Apollo which has degree awarding powers, has been lobbying the government heavily to relax the regulations on who can call themselves a university.</p>
<p>As the Times Higher reported on 24 June, the government has faced &#8221;intense lobbying by BPP, and other private providers, to bring in changes that would help them compete on a &#8220;level playing field&#8221; with publicly funded institutions. Suggestions include allowing the private sector better access to the student loans system, making it easier for them to call themselves universities, and wider distribution of degree-awarding powers.”</p>
<p><a href="http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&amp;storycode=412183&amp;c=1">http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&amp;storycode=412183&amp;c=1</a></p>
<p>BPP has secured the government&#8217;s agreement that it will be allowed to call itself a &#8216;university college&#8217; &#8211; an ambiguous title that does not require it to fulfil the current requirements of &#8216;university title&#8217;.</p>
<p>The union ran a poll of 500 professors which showed that an overwhelming majority (96%) did not believe it should be easier for private companies to call themselves universities.</p>
<p>UCU general secretary, Sally Hunt, said: “Encouraging the growth of private providers and making it easier for them to call themselves universities would be a disaster for the UK’s academic reputation. It would also represent a huge threat to academic freedom and standards.”</p>
<p>In September UCU produced a report outlining its concerns over the expansion of private providers in UK higher education. A copy of <em>Privatising our Universities</em> can be found at <a href="http://tinyurl.com/2uad6g5" target="_blank">http://tinyurl.com/2uad6g5</a></p>
<p>Further reading:</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/34qa6lc" target="_blank">http://tinyurl.com/34qa6lc</a><strong> </strong>– press release</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/27ujcqz" target="_blank">http://tinyurl.com/27ujcqz</a> &#8211; Telegraph</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/2010/08/uk-academics-slam-privatisation-of-universities-as-bpp-becomes-university-college/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UK HE crisis: 22,000 staff at risk &#8211; 200,000 students miss out</title>
		<link>http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/2010/08/uk-he-crisis-22000-staff-at-risk-200000-students-miss-out/</link>
		<comments>http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/2010/08/uk-he-crisis-22000-staff-at-risk-200000-students-miss-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 16:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ucu campaigns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[higher education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/?p=307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>22,000 staff risk losing their jobs if the government presses ahead with plans to cut 25% more from already slashed HE budgets, according to UCU research published in July: http://www.ucu.org.uk/index.cfm?articleid=4736&#38;from=4725&#38;start=11</p>
<p>This comes at the same time as news that 200,000 young people will miss out on a university place this year as a result of cuts [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>22,000 staff risk losing their jobs if the government presses ahead with plans to cut 25% more from already slashed HE budgets, according to UCU research published in July: <a href="http://www.ucu.org.uk/index.cfm?articleid=4736&amp;from=4725&amp;start=11">http://www.ucu.org.uk/index.cfm?articleid=4736&amp;from=4725&amp;start=11</a></p>
<p>This comes at the same time as news that 200,000 young people will miss out on a university place this year as a result of cuts already made and that the government is encouraging young people to &#8216;aim lower&#8217; in the future: <a href="http://www.ucu.org.uk/index.cfm?articleid=4988&amp;from=4775">http://www.ucu.org.uk/index.cfm?articleid=4988&amp;from=4775</a></p>
<p>UCU general secretary Sally Hunt has warned the government that &#8220;Other countries are increasing the number of graduates to compete in a high-skill knowledge economy, yet our government seems intent on doing the opposite. It is not scaremongering to talk about a lost generation of learners.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ucu.org.uk/index.cfm?articleid=4749&amp;from=4725">http://www.ucu.org.uk/index.cfm?articleid=4749&amp;from=4725</a></p>
<p>It is also this context of public austerity that is accelerating the drive toward using the private sector: <a href="http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/2010/08/uk-academics-slam-privatisation-of-universities-as-bpp-becomes-university-college/">http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/2010/08/uk-academics-slam-privatisation-of-universities-as-bpp-becomes-university-college/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/2010/08/uk-he-crisis-22000-staff-at-risk-200000-students-miss-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New briefing on KAPLAN</title>
		<link>http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/2010/08/new-briefing-on-kaplan/</link>
		<comments>http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/2010/08/new-briefing-on-kaplan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 16:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ucu campaigns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Providers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kaplan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privatisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/?p=282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Please find a new briefing document, produced by UCU on KAPLAN&#8217;s presence in UK higher education. KAPLAN are on of the three large US education businesses, alongside Apollo and Laureate, that now have a foothold in UK higher education. With the new Coalition government set to encourage more private companies to step in to fill [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please find a new briefing document, produced by UCU on KAPLAN&#8217;s presence in UK higher education. KAPLAN are on of the three large US education businesses, alongside Apollo and Laureate, that now have a foothold in UK higher education. With the new Coalition government set to encourage more private companies to step in to fill the holes left by their massive funding cuts, KAPLAN are to be watched. Hope you find it useful: <a href="http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/CME-Kaplan-briefing.pdf">http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/CME-Kaplan-briefing.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/2010/08/new-briefing-on-kaplan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Private pathways programs target U.S. &#8220;market&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/2010/08/private-pathways-programs-target-u-s-market/</link>
		<comments>http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/2010/08/private-pathways-programs-target-u-s-market/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 14:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>caut</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Providers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joint venture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kaplan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navitas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Study Group International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/?p=273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Inside Higher Ed reports that U.S. colleges are increasingly turning to for-profit pathway programs for international students in a bid to boost revenues.</p>
<p>In January 2010, Australia-based Navitas sealed its first U.S. deal, a 10-year contract with Western Kentucky University.  Since then,  the company has signed three more  agreements – with the  Universities of Massachusetts [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inside Higher Ed <a href="http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2010/08/04/pathways" target="_blank">reports </a>that U.S. colleges are increasingly turning to for-profit pathway programs for international students in a bid to boost revenues.</p>
<p>In January 2010, Australia-based Navitas sealed its first U.S. deal, a 10-year contract with Western Kentucky University.  Since then,  the company has signed three more  agreements – with the  Universities of Massachusetts at Boston, Dartmouth and Lowell.</p>
<p>Students entering the Navitas program at Western Kentucky will need deep pockets.  According to the <a href="http://www.navitas.com/media/pdf/flyer_wku.pdf" target="_self">fee schedule</a>, the costs are over $22,000 for three semesters, plus a mandatory $1,000 medical insurance charge. The pre-master&#8217;s program is nearly $10,000 and runs just one semester.</p>
<p>With the U.S. recession clobbering college finances, other for-profit pathway providers are swooping down upon campuses across the country with promises of bountiful new revenue streams from full fee-paying international students. Study Group International, <a href="http://www.studygroup.com/media_centre/Providence_Equity_Partners_Acquires_Study_Group.aspx" target="_self">recently purchased by a U.S. private equity firm</a>, is setting up programs at Dean and Fisher Colleges, and Madison University. Meanwhile, Kaplan International which already runs a &#8220;Global Pathways Program&#8221; at Northeastern University opened its second program earlier this year at the University of Utah.  And UK-based INTO has signed long-term contracts with Oregon State University and the  University of South Florida.</p>
<p>INTO&#8217;s joint ventures with Oregon State and South Florida generated <a href="http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2010/05/10/usf">headlines</a> earlier this year when the Commission on English Language Accreditation initially revoked the accreditation of the two universities&#8217; English language institutes after they were taken over by INTO.</p>
<p>Ironically, the rising number of private pathways programs comes at a time when the <a href="http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2010/06/24/forprofit">U.S. Congress is looking at new rules</a> to reign in the more questionable practices of many for-profit colleges. Surely it&#8217;s time to shine a similar light on Navitas, Study Group, Kaplan and INTO?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/2010/08/private-pathways-programs-target-u-s-market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Private company lobbies for de-regulation of UK universities</title>
		<link>http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/2010/06/private-company-lobbies-for-de-regulation-of-uk-universities/</link>
		<comments>http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/2010/06/private-company-lobbies-for-de-regulation-of-uk-universities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 12:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ucu campaigns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Providers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apollo Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privatisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Phoenix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/?p=268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>UK private education company BPP College has been lobbying the new coalition government for further de-regulation of the rules governing university status in moves that would open the door for the further expansion of the private sector. A story in the Times Higher Education magazine appeared to confirm what UCU has suspected, that BPP has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UK private education company BPP College has been lobbying the new coalition government for further de-regulation of the rules governing university status in moves that would open the door for the further expansion of the private sector. A story in the Times Higher Education magazine appeared to confirm what UCU has suspected, that BPP has been lobbying the government hard for the right to call itself a univeristy and for the right to access state backed student loans. The for-profit provider s already has degree-awarding powers and was recently bought by Apollo inc. In the context of the massive new round of cuts announced in all public sector departments, private companies like BPP are clearly looking to open up more space to expand in much the same way as universities like Phoenix, also owned by Apollo have managed in the USA. For the full story, click here: <a href="http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&amp;storycode=412183&amp;c=1">http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&amp;storycode=412183&amp;c=1</a></p>
<p>To read UCU&#8217;s report into the growing threat of privatisation in UK universities, click here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ucu.org.uk/media/pdf/9/6/ucu_privatisingouruniversities_feb10.pdf">http://www.ucu.org.uk/media/pdf/9/6/ucu_privatisingouruniversities_feb10.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/2010/06/private-company-lobbies-for-de-regulation-of-uk-universities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Perils of Branch Campuses</title>
		<link>http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/2010/06/the-perils-of-branch-campuses/</link>
		<comments>http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/2010/06/the-perils-of-branch-campuses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 16:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>caut</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[branch campus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joint venture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/?p=259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As more and more universities and colleges seek out alleged fortunes overseas by setting up branch campuses, nagging questions linger about the financial stability of these ventures.  We are being told by governments and employers alike that money is scarce after all.  So surely our administrators are being careful about how they are spending their [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As more and more universities and colleges seek out alleged fortunes overseas by setting up branch campuses, nagging questions linger about the financial stability of these ventures.  We are being told by governments and employers alike that money is scarce after all.  So surely our administrators are being careful about how they are spending their scarce resources? But a <a href="http://www.newsdurhamregion.com/news/article/156410" target="_blank">story </a>in the obscure <em>Durham Business News</em> in Canada this week highlights the financial risks that institutions don&#8217;t always tell us when embarking on their overseas joint ventures.</p>
<p>According to the report, Oshawa&#8217;s <a href="http://www.durhamcollege.ca/" target="_blank">Durham College</a> is posting up big losses on branch campus projects with private partners in Panama and India. According to the report, the college admits it lost CA $500,000 on a campus in  Bangalore, India.  Not one student walked through the door.  Ah, but that expensive lesson was forgotten almost immediately as the college went on to spend another  half a million Canadian dollars on a campus in  Panama. That campus did graduate a handful of students of least, but those students have sued the  college. They&#8217;re claiming programs they had been promised weren&#8217;t delivered.  The campus has now been closed and the college has terminated its entire international program.</p>
<p>The big question is how many other colleges and universities are throwing away money?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/2010/06/the-perils-of-branch-campuses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australian union calls for fair trial for Dr Beltran</title>
		<link>http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/2010/04/australian-union-calls-for-fair-trial-for-dr-beltran/</link>
		<comments>http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/2010/04/australian-union-calls-for-fair-trial-for-dr-beltran/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 09:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ucu campaigns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[academic freedom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/?p=250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to the National Tertiary Education Union of Australia (NTEU) for writing to President Uribe of Colombia calling for a fair trial for Dr Beltran. The NTEU&#8217;s letter, copied to Education International and the minister for Foreign Affairs in Australia, notes that Dr Beltran is a prisoner of conscience and calls for independent observers to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to the National Tertiary Education Union of Australia (NTEU) for writing to President Uribe of Colombia calling for a fair trial for Dr Beltran. The NTEU&#8217;s letter, copied to Education International and the minister for Foreign Affairs in Australia, notes that Dr Beltran is a prisoner of conscience and calls for independent observers to be present at his trial. You can read the letter here:<a href="http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/NTEUletterDrBeltran.doc">http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/NTEUletterDrBeltran.doc</a></p>
<p>We need more letters from education unions around the world. Please help.</p>
<p>Jonathan White</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://educationsolidaritynetwork.org/2010/04/australian-union-calls-for-fair-trial-for-dr-beltran/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
